|
Management's Discussion and Analysis
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS PEPSI-COLA
PEPSI-COLA NORTH AMERICA
1998 vs. 1997
BCS increased 6%, led by the strong single-digit growth of the Mountain Dew brand, contributions from Pepsi One (our new one-calorie cola) and strong double-digit growth of Aquafina bottled water and Lipton Brisk. Brand Pepsi and brand Diet Pepsi also contributed to this year's growth, both advancing at single-digit rates. Concentrate shipments to franchisees grew at a slightly faster rate than their BCS growth.
Reported operating profit decreased $63 million. Ongoing operating profit declined $99 million primarily due to planned increases in S&D and A&M and higher G&A costs, partially offset by volume growth. S&D grew faster than sales and volume, due to an increase in our sales force and higher depreciation, maintenance and labor costs associated with cooler and vendor placements. A&M expenses grew significantly faster than sales and volume reflecting new product launches, such as Pepsi One, and planned increases for Project Globe and Pop Culture promotions. The G&A growth includes higher spending on information systems related to the Year 2000 and other projects and higher costs associated with the continued building of our fountain business infrastructure.
1997 vs. 1996
BCS increased 4%, primarily reflecting double-digit growth by the Mountain Dew brand. Non-carbonated soft drink products, led by Aquafina bottled water and Lipton Brisk tea, grew at a double-digit rate. Our concentrate shipments to franchisees grew at a slower rate than their BCS growth during the year.
Reported operating profit declined $154 million. Ongoing operating profit declined $102 million, reflecting the lower effective net pricing, higher S&D costs and increased A&M. S&D grew significantly faster than sales, but in line with volume. A&M grew significantly faster than sales and volume, primarily reflecting above average levels of expenditures late in 1997. These unfavorable items were reduced by the volume gains and lower packaging and commodity costs. G&A savings from centralizing certain administrative functions were fully offset by Year 2000 spending and infrastructure development costs related to our new fountain business sales team. The decline in ongoing operating profit is also due to the absence of 1996 gains from the sale of an investment in a bottling cooperative and a settlement made with a supplier.
PEPSI-COLA INTERNATIONAL
1998 vs. 1997
BCS increased 6% reflecting double-digit growth in Mexico, the Philippines, India, Pakistan and China. In addition, BCS grew at a high double-digit rate in Venezuela reflecting the continued momentum by the joint venture as it increased its territories and capacity. These advances were partially offset by lower BCS in Japan due to the elimination of certain PepsiCo-owned brands by the new bottler Suntory. The PepsiCo-owned brands that continued to be sold by Suntory grew at a double-digit rate. Total concentrate shipments to franchisees increased at about the same rate as their BCS.
Reported operating results declined $75 million. Ongoing operating results declined $11 million. The decline primarily reflects higher losses in Russia due to our increased ownership as well as the impact of the economic crisis. Excluding the impact of Russia, operating results would have increased driven by volume gains (reported by most of our Business Units) and lower G&A expenses, due in part to savings from our 1996 restructuring. These gains were partially reduced by higher A&M, increased equity losses from unconsolidated affiliates and lower effective net pricing.
1997 vs. 1996
BCS increased 1%. Strong double-digit growth in China, the Philippines and India was reduced by double-digit declines in Brazil, Venezuela and South Africa. The decline in Venezuela reflects the impact of the loss of our bottler in August 1996 while the decline in South Africa results from the cessation of our joint venture operation. In November 1996, we entered into a new joint venture to replace the Venezuelan bottler. Total concentrate shipments to franchisees increased at about the same rate as their BCS.
Reported operating losses declined $702 million. Ongoing operating results improved by $280 million, reflecting a small profit in 1997 compared to a loss in 1996. The improvement in ongoing operating results was driven by lower manufacturing costs, reduced net losses from our investments in unconsolidated affiliates and lower G&A expenses. Operating results also benefited from the absence of 1996's higher-than-normal expenses from fourth quarter balance sheet adjustments and actions. The lower manufacturing costs were primarily due to favorable raw material costs and lower depreciation resulting from certain businesses held for disposal. The reduced net losses from our unconsolidated affiliates were primarily driven by the absence of losses from BAESA. The lower G&A expenses reflect savings from our fourth quarter 1996 restructuring of about $70 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© PepsiCo, Inc. - Terms of Use l Privacy Policy